By Anne Rossier-Renaud and Olivier Meier, Mercer
The concept of automation conjures all sorts of images in the mind of HR professionals: unrealistic  vision of HR teams freed from menial work as well as fear of more job losses in  a function already threatened by outsourcing and delocalization. As the  adoption of automation accelerates, HR and mobility teams cannot stay out of  the debate and need to develop a clear vision for the implementation of new  technologies as well as practical strategies to ensure that  automation benefits both the  company and the employees. The adoption of automation should  be part of a wider  reflection to help HR become a people-centered function that  places a premium on exceptional personal and digital employee interactions,  with employee satisfaction as the key success metric. 
A work  in progress
Almost one-third of companies are already  using automation to manage at least part of their mobility tasks. However, most  of them are just at early stage of using automation and less than 10%  do it in a significant way. Another  third would like to implement automation but have not taken action yet. Just  below 31% of companies report   that they do not plan to introduce automation for the time being.
    
    Are  automation solutions being used to streamline parts of your global mobility  process? (N=116)
    
    
        
            | Yes, we are using automation in a    significant way | 8.6% | 
        
            | Yes, we are just beginning to use    automation | 21.6% | 
        
            | No, we are not using automation but would    like to | 32.8% | 
        
            | No, we are not using automation but do not    currently intend to | 31.0 % | 
        
            | Other | 6.0% | 
    
 
Source: Mercer 2019’s Mobility Organization and Transformation Survey
Addressing  the vision gap
While the interest for automation is there, a  lack of clear vision seems to hold back many organizations: almost half of companies  don’t have a clear strategic vision about mobility management automation. And  the ones with a vision don’t always translate it into action.
Respondents report that they are still  evaluating their options or trying to evaluate their internal infrastructures and  resources. Implementing new solutions raise issues about system integration.  The integration of new technology needs to be planned with the requirements of the  whole organization in mind. Mobility tasks involve manipulating data that stems  from multiple sources in HR but also from other departments and geographically  spread business units.
The  fact that mobility and HR teams often don’t  have the budget and skills to implement new solutions on their own also put the brakes on  automation and militates for an integrated company-wide strategy.
    Do you  have a strategic vision for automation/robotization of global mobility  management in your company? (N=118) 
    
        
            | Yes, we have a strategic vision but no    action is currently being taken | 11.0% | 
        
            | We are beginning to assess the need for    such a strategic vision | 29.7% | 
        
            | No, we don’t have a strategic vision | 44.9% | 
        
            | Other | 5.1% | 
        
            | Not    applicable | 9.3% | 
    
 
Source: Mercer 2019’s Mobility Organization and Transformation Survey 
How to benefit from Automation?
The objectives behind automation are to  alleviate workload and ultimately reduce costs as well as eliminate errors.
Not surprisingly, respondents intended focus is on automating recurring work such  as cost projections and assignment documents or recurring  reports generation over  interaction with assignees (e.g. assignee briefings.)
    What  are the main areas that you are most interested in automating?  (N=110)
    
        
            | Cost projection | 50.0% | 
        
            | Creation of assignment documents | 42.7% | 
        
            | Generation of recurring reports | 35.5% | 
        
            | Assignment initiation | 27.3% | 
        
            | Immigration: initiation, tracking,    monitoring and compliance | 25.5% | 
        
            | Payroll instructions (including gross ups    and assignment allowance calculations) | 23.6% | 
        
            | Tax: initiation, tracking, monitoring and    compliance | 21.8% | 
        
            | Compensation calculations | 20.9% | 
        
            | Compensation collection | 18.2% | 
        
            | Vendor initiation/authorization | 18.2% | 
        
            | Assignee briefings | 4.5% | 
    
 
Source: Mercer 2019’s Mobility Organization and Transformation Survey 
Mobility professionals report that   their aim is to facilitate administration but not replace the team. They doubt  that the entire function can be automatized due to the high level of service  required by assignees. Automation could even balance off-sourcing or job  delocalization by offering a cheaper option to maintain the HR activities in-house  and in the same location.
The challenge for many HR professionals is to  determine the right balance between automation and the human touch. On the one  hand, maintaining the human touch is  important as HR is dealing with complex human issues affecting not only the  employees but also their entire families. On the other hand, the very qualities  that make us human also produce imperfections that impact the quality of the  services. Some assignees need to be handled with sensitivity and psychology  while in other cases, employees have no desire to contact a human available  only during business hours, who might not be customer oriented, and won’t have  readily available answers.
Ultimately, the issue is not just the degree  of automation but how to manage effectively the interaction between human users  and the machine.
The  benefits of a people-centric  approach
One of the risk of implementation is to  design solutions that replicate current approaches instead of taking this  opportunity to re-think processes from a user perspective using Design Thinking. The fundamental questions  behind the Design Thinking philosophy are: How to put the employee’s experience  at the center of the solution development process? How to learn from  stakeholders and end users’ experiences to  simplify processes and make tool and solutions  intuitive and easy to use? 
Organizations have  traditionally relied on the “Target  Operating Model” describing a  desired framework largely based on the experience of  management and HR. It is time to shift  to a “Target  Interaction Model” focused  on facilitating and delivering exceptional personal  and digital employee interactions.
Implementing a   Target  Interaction Model involves different steps:
    - Defining  the model: what  should be the  p erfect  HR  role to allow the  company to deliver its objectives while elevating the employee experience? A  combination of Design Thinking workshops  and solution prototyping using Agile approaches  can help the function answers  this question and set its compass. 
- Assessing  the current state of the function: A thorough and  honest assessment based on interviews  and analyses to understand the current employee experience,  business impact, maturity of the function as well as current degree of  automation is required. 
- Establishing a baseline user  experience: In practice this means mapping  the path that assignees, HR, and management have to  follow. Are there grey policy areas, communication issues, or tools and  solutions that are not user friendly? Where are the touchpoints when dealing  with the different assignment types? The answers to this questions can be  translated into a journey map detailing visually the story / experience from  the user's or employee’s perspective. Employee personas can be used to better  understand the characteristics and needs of the different groups of employees .
- Considering the  interactions that will deliver the service portfolio:  This includes the role of people leaders (shifting from the role of rule  enforcers to team coaches), the level of interaction (personal or high touch),  and the communication channels as well as the potential need  for different types of interactions for different talent  groups.
- Delivering the Target  Integration Model service portfolio  holistically across the organization: a successful  transformation covers several dimensions: processes, systems, content and  organization. All these dimensions need to addressed  simultaneously as fixing a system problem in isolation could  trigger systemic issues elsewhere. 
Implementing new solutions to automatize  mobility management is not merely a technical question. It is an opportunity to  participate in strategic discussions about business transformation and position  HR and mobility professionals as “people experience architects” – i.e. key  players in the future of work.
Find  out more about automating mobility management tasks with Mercer’s  Mobility Management Platform.